Website context review: findings and changes.

Restoring the full website

The restoration left summary/detail contradictions and incomplete discussion-page conversions. This editorial pass integrates the chapters, recovers missing paragraphs and lists from all 26 source discussion documents, and edits the mechanisms and calculations in place.

The page register below records the actual work on every root HTML page. Archived snapshots remain unchanged for comparison; older downloadable documents are labeled separately from the reading edition.

What caused the loss of context

• Current healthcare and education pages emphasized service coverage and legacy government budgets without clearly naming Stability Accounts as the intended lifetime funding foundation.
• Governance pages did not state the intended local/state/federal division prominently.
• The earlier review withdrew the 2.5% endpoint instead of retaining it explicitly as a policy target.
• Regional scenarios and historical outreach or discussion pages competed with current explanations.
• Search results observed on November 1 still showed earlier page wording despite newer published content.

What changed

Changes include a consistent chapter structure and contents links, full discussion-paper text, corrected tax and compounding examples, explicit reconciliation of detailed budgets, coordinated funding and governance explanations, and topic links between policies and discussion papers.

Some retained discussion statistics remain earlier estimates awaiting direct sourcing. They are identified at the relevant sections; they are not re-certified as current facts. This is an editorial review, not independent economic or legal validation.

What publication cannot guarantee

These changes improve source clarity and discovery. Search engines and outside AI systems decide when to recrawl and how to summarize. A sitemap and structured question-and-answer data are descriptive aids, not a guarantee of indexing, ranking, special search presentation or a particular AI response. This release has not demonstrated corrected answers in every external system.

Remaining work

• A reconciled financial model for all age groups, service costs and timing.
• Rules for community decisions, state oversight, pooling, appeals and shortfalls.
• Legal and institutional implementation of the proposed federal role.
• Demonstration of the conditions needed for a 2.5% GRT and debt elimination.
• Later observation of search and external AI answers after recrawling.

Page-by-page editorial register